Very Well Read

Quotations from, and the occasional reflection on, things that I have read.

minority report

I saw this book while browing around the library and decided to pick it up because I enjoyed the movie. That, and I was enamoured with the way this book flips up to open, instead of horizontally.

Minority Report is really just a short story and so was quite a quick read. And I was rather surprised by the story, because it was quite different from the movie, in fact…. oh wait, I suppose I should put a spoiler alert here before I say more. In fact, the story sort of gives the exact opposite message to what you get from the movie. In the movie, Tom Cruise, ur, John Anderton decides to not kill anyone, thus proving that the whole PreCrime system is not infalliable and innocent people are being arrested; we do have free choice and our fate is not predetermined. In the story, however, Anderton makes the decision in the end to kill the person who the majority report says he is going to kill – the moral of the story: PreCrime works! Oh ya, and there are two minority reports, not just one, and they are based on the fact that Anderton sees the majority report (although you can hardly call it a “majority” when it is just one of three reports) and that changes the future. When asked if there is any flaw in the system, Anderton says, “It can happen in only one circumstance. My case was unique, since I had access to the data. It could happen again, but only to the next Police Comissioner” (p. 103) So, people really don’t have any choice, the future is predictable. All in all, I’d have to say I liked the movie better.

A few more points I found interesting:

  • In the short story, Anderton is bald, fat and on the brink of retirment; in the movie, Anderton is played by Tom Cruise. Simlarily, Donna, the female precog, is 45 years and the precogs are all hideously “deformed and retarded” (p. 9); in the movie, they are young and attractive. Hollywood just couldn’t have that!
  • Anytime you read a “futuristic” piece that talks about how something is “transcribed on conventional punchcards, and ejected into various coded slots” (p. 8) and data stored on “tapes” (p. 57) you know someone missed a mark.
  • Similarily, I find it amusing that Dick thought that in the future, people would not only be listening to radios (I’m pretty sure I’m the only person still doing that!), but that they’d use terms like “a priori” (p. 48) on a radio broadcast for the general public.

Dick, Philip K. The minority report. New York : Carol Publishing Group, 1991.


Single Post Navigation

3 thoughts on “minority report

  1. amelia bedelia on said:

    this edition is awesome, I love how it’s bound at the top instead of the side.

  2. Lord Fondleberries on said:

    you have to keep things in context, my well read friend: minority report was written in 1956, hence the references to punch cards and tapes. dick was (and remains long after his death) a visionary sf writer. he also brought you such favorites as “do andrioids dream of electric sheep”, which was made into the very great film “bladerunner”; “paycheck”, which was butchered by woo and afleck; “a scanner darkly”, which mister linkletter saw fit to draw over; and several others.

    also, it should be impossible to like any film with tom cruise in it.

  3. bvllets on said:

    I thought Minority Report was one of the most outlandish movies I have ever seen. I like visions of the future in sci-fi movies, but it should at least have a bit of semblance to reality. I actually found Strawberry Shortcake more believeable than this movie.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: